![]() ![]() The focus of the case can be an individual, an event, a family, an organization, or even a place (Mariano, 1995). 88), and often employs a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques (Yin, 2003). Case method is most useful when the research is focused on a “specific, unique, bounded system” (Stake, 1998, p. It is the method of choice when the data to be collected about a situation will come from many sources including people, observation, records, etc. Case, as a research method, is an effective research strategy for answering questions that begin with words such as “how” and “why” (Yin, 2003). That familiar case study is similar to, but not the same as, the case research method presented here. ![]() Nurses learned the nursing process using case studies, and you have probably read or heard case presentations at clinical conferences. Both case and grounded theory research methods will be presented and examples provided for use of each in relation to urologic nursing.Ĭase studies are familiar to most nurses. The goal of grounded theory is to develop theories that describe or explain particular situations and accurately perceive and present another’s world (Hutchinson, 1993). ![]() The goal of case method is to describe a contemporary situation within its real-life context (Stake, 1995 Yin, 2003). The two methods will be discussed together because although they have different goals, their roots are in sociology and they employ several of the same strategies for data collection. Two methods of qualitative inquiry axe case method and grounded theory. The theoretical underpinnings, methodologies, strategies for data collection, requirements for trustworthiness, and examples of research using case and grounded theory are described. They are ideal methods for nursing research, as they are useful for exploring human responses to health problems. Both methods have their roots in sociology and are focused on understanding, explaining, and/or predicting human behavior. Reconceptualizing grounded theory allows us to more intentionally account for evolving cultural nuances that influence the engineering education experience as to further broaden participation in the field and the impacts of our work.Case and grounded theory are two methods of qualitative research. Lastly, we offer a reconceptualized perspective of grounded theory and implications for expanding its use in the engineering education community.ĭiscussion/Conclusions: We encourage engineering education researchers to position grounded theory as a living methodology that not only generates new theory, but also bridges past and current research by deepening methodological and theoretical connections across contexts. ![]() Third, we compare and clarify points of confusion often encountered in conducting grounded theory studies. Second, we describe the difference between implementing grounded theory methodology versus applying grounded theory methods. Scope: First, we discuss the historical and paradigmatic underpinnings of three grounded theory traditions: classic, pragmatic, and constructivist grounded theory. By gaining a greater understanding of the paradigmatic underpinnings and practices of grounded theory, scholars in engineering education will be better equipped to assess the affordances and limitations of this approach and identify when, why, and how it is appropriate for implementation in their work. Purpose: In this theoretical manuscript, we reflect on the evolution of grounded theory and its core tenets to implore engineering education to think about the ways we can collectively conceptualize, interpret, and implement this methodology. This can be problematic for novice researchers and those new to the methodology and may potentially limit its application and theoretical contributions to the field. However, this methodology has been adopted in a variety of ways across the engineering education landscape, reflecting and amplifying debates surrounding the nature and quality of grounded theory research. Background: Grounded theory has evolved to become one of the most prominent qualitative approaches in social science research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |